House Report Language

110TH CONGRESS

Report

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1st Session

110-187

--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2008

June 11, 2007- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

Mr. DICKS, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following

R E P O R T

together with Additional Views

[To accompany H.R. 2643]

The Committee on Appropriations submits the following report in explanation of the accompanying bill making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008 and for other purposes…

ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS, FOREST SERVICE

The Committee is concerned about the huge costs of agency business process centralization and therefore directs that detailed reports remain a part of the budget justification and that all expenses be carefully evaluated and explained, and transparent to the public at large…

The Committee notes that the Forest Service has done a poor job of implementing its competitive sourcing program. Section 414 in Title IV general provisions includes bill language providing a one-year moratorium for the Forest Service on this matter. The Committee notes that its investigations staff previously found widespread management lapses which required legislative action. P.L. 109-54 Sec. 422(d) requires the Forest Service to report, `in accordance with full cost accounting principles, all costs attributable to developing, implementing, supporting, managing, monitoring, and reporting on competitive sourcing, including personnel, consultant, travel, and training costs associated with program management.' This has not been implemented. The Committee understands that alleged savings are not substantiated. The Forest Service has inadequately considered the potential impact on its ability to provide emergency wildfire staffing when engaging in competitive sourcing which could dramatically alter the Federal workforce.

TITLE IV--GENERAL PROVISIONS

 

Section 414 continues a provision which provides guidance on competitive sourcing activities and clarifies annual reporting requirements to specify the reporting of the full costs associated with sourcing studies and related activities. The provision continues the funding cap of $3,450,000 for the Department of the Interior and also establishes a moratorium for one-year regarding Forest Service competitive sourcing activities. Forest Service competitive sourcing is discussed in more detail under the Forest Service, Administrative Provisions heading.

 

*          *          *

36-168

110TH CONGRESS

Report

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

1st Session

110-187

--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ENVIRONMENT, AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATION BILL, 2008

June 22, 2007- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed

Mr. DICKS of Washington, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following

SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT

[To accompany H.R. 2643]

The Committee on Appropriations submits the following additional report in explanation of H.R. 2643, making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. This report augments, but does not replace, instructions and guidance provided in House Report 110-187, the initial report filed by the Committee on this bill on June 11, 2007...

Contractors- The Executive Branch also engages in another practice which steers or directs money to specific entities or purposes through a process of contracting out various activities and services. In many important work locations, the number of people working for contractors exceeds the number of Federal employees in the same building or location. Many of these, in fact, are non-competitive or sole-sourced. When added together, the Executive Branch steers or directs far greater spending to specific projects or corporations than is directed or earmarked by Congress. And the practice of non-competitive contracting has exploded in the past five years. For example, the Department of the Interior reported to the Committee that the value of contracts awarded through processes that were `not fully and openly competitive' increased from $26 million in 2000 to $167 million in 2005.