This information is important to you as a union official. It is also important to any employee with an email account.
The Hatch Act is often confused with prohibitions on lobbying. The Hatch Act deals with overt political support for or against a CANDIDATE running for partisan political office. It is all about ELECTIONS. However, the confusion comes into play because "political activity" is broadly defined. At times, a strictly issue-based email or posting on a bulletin board in the workplace can be construed to be political -- if the issue is associated with a partisan political party. Here are the basics you need to remember before you hit the "send" button:
The line is not easy to define, but these examples should help. The default penalty for a Hatch Act violation is removal; the minimum penalty is a 30-day suspension. Be careful out there! For more information on the Hatch Act, go to http://www.osc.gov/hatchact.htm.
A separate issue is other law that prohibits the expenditure of appropriated funds for lobbying purposes. An exception to this general prohibition is the negotiated provisions giving our Council Officers and those attending Legislative Week the right to communicate directly with Congress. However, union officials may not use appropriated funds for a different lobbying activity: attempting to influence others to contact Congress on pending or anticipated legislation. In other words, union officials, like any employee, may not use government email to forward "calls to action" on legislative matters. On the other hand, it is absolutely fine, and in fact an important function, to communicate with the employees we represent, including sending informational emails about issues of importance to the workforce.
For more information about the specifics of the union's ability to lobby and where the lines are, refer to the Legislative Training PowerPoint, posted at http://www.nffe-fsc.org/committees/legislative/.
/s/ Mark Davis
Mark Davis, President
NFFE Forest Service Council